Skip to main content

Chief Complaint: no room for failure

In the early parts of medical school, we were focused on basic sciences which include anatomy, physiology etc. However, the whole thing's organized by organ systems, making it some weird hybrid of problem-based learning and the traditional approach. We're told the system's unique to my school, at least in the Philippines. But this is actually a topic for another time. What I'm here to discuss is something else entirely.

During the first two years of medical school, the only learning we had in terms of clinical skills was through the conduct of demo-return demo sessions (wherein a consultant first demonstrates the skills followed by students trying (sometimes miserably) to replicate them), eventually culminating into OSCEs (will discuss these in the future). We also had to do several patient interviews during small group discussions (SGDs). Many first years would consider the ward works in Neurology midway through the 2nd semester to be highlights of the freshman year because they're the first time we're actually required to do complete history and physical examination (especially neurological) of a patient in the wards. This is actually the staple of clinical learning during 2nd year.

My biggest issue back then was that I felt our professors/consultants were dismayed and disapproving with errors in all forms (e.g. forgetting to perform a maneuver or performing it incorrectly, missing out on an important detail in the history). I understand that it's probably just to safeguard our future patients from incompetence, but I do think that mistakes and failures could have been handled in a more constructive manner. I've seen firsthand how this stigma on failure actually removes our focus on the patient and become more concerned with ticking off everything we need to do on our lists. We were more concerned with performing rather than learning. And at such an early stage of our development as physicians, I believe learning well would be much better for our future patients.

Now that I'm in my 3rd year and transitioning into hospital-based learning from classroom-based, I appreciate the sentiment that we're given room to make mistakes because they understand we're just starting. They understand that more than anything, we need guidance, not a reprimand. I hope that even in the early years, students are allowed to fail because every year, I see a new batch enter medical school with an even greater aversion to failure. Every new batch also looks more stressed than the previous one.

I do not deny that there is growth in being able to perform well, but I believe giving everyone some space to fail is akin to exponentially increasing everyone's space to not just grow but to grow well and become better human beings.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Assessment: Uni-ball Jetstream 0.5 mm vs Pilot Acroball Fine (0.7 mm)

Hey, guys!  This will be the first of my reviews. Please bear with me as I haven't really ironed out the criteria for judging. I just wanted to put up something light.  Today, my black Uniball Signo Micro 207 ran out of ink as I was writing down my physical examination findings on the chart, so after being dismissed, I went to National Book Store (For those of you wondering, it's the country's most famous store for office and school supplies. No, it's not a public or state-owned company) to buy a new pen. Well, they were out of stock for the Micro 207, so I checked if they had the Micro 307. Unfortunately, they still don't have it. (As a side note, I would really like to point out how the National Book Store branch in Robinsons Place Manila (a shopping mall near my school) seems to be always lacking. It's a bit frustrating.)  So, I chose new pens. I have some kind of affinity for Uni pens, having the Uni pin 0.2 mm as my first Uni writing instrument. ...

s/p ICC year

It's been more than half a year since my last post, and a lot has happened since then. I got a new phone, a Flash Plus 2 which I got at a very affordable price on Lazada (thanks to my brother who financed the purchase). I turned 22, which wasn't really a big deal. Most importantly, I finished my 3rd year in medical school (known as the "ICC year" because 3rd year medical students are referred to as Integrated Clinical Clerks/ICC). As ICCs, we transitioned from lecture halls to the clinics. ICC year focuses mostly on ambulatory care, so we spent most of our time at the clinics in the out-patient department. A lot of the students really like the ICC year because of the relative amount of free time with which we get to do just about anything we want. Some use it to explore new experiences or develop new skills. Some focus on extracurricular activities by being more active in student organizations, even becoming leaders while others really just use the time to rest and ...

always changing

Three years ago (thanks, Facebook, for reminding me!), I listened to a TED talk by Dan Gilbert entitled "The Psychology of Your Future Self," and even now, the message still resonates with me. It reminds me that with all my faults and mistakes, I am still not done. I am not done trying to make things better, making myself better. There is hope that in the future, as I take my last breath, I can be satisfied and proud of my identity, my work and my legacy. Dan Gilbert ends with the one of the most powerful ideas I have encountered: "Most of us can remember who we were 10 years ago, but we find it hard to imagine who we're going to be, and then we mistakenly think that because it's hard to imagine, it's not likely to happen. Sorry, when people say "I can't imagine that," they're usually talking about their own lack of imagination, and not about the unlikelihood of the event that they're describing. The bottom line is, time is a powe...